|
Laws impinge on the livelihood of street vendors
in rather harsh ways raising the awkward question of being
humiliated by own people even though one is trying to
make a living through hard labour in adverse circumstances.
As the pressure on urban land increase further, more and
more sections of different laws are being invoked to harass,
exploit and drive away the street vendors. Evictions have
become order of the day. Police looks out for sections
in IPC and CrPC which can be used to break the backbone
of street vendors. The negative use of the laws not only
destabilizes the livelihood of street vendors but also
expose them to exploitative forces creating dirty vicious
cycle of extortion. Vendors are forced to believe that
they are out there merely because of patronage by few
rather than because of their right to livelihood.
The Supreme court in
Sodhan Singh vs NDMC declared street vending as a fundamental
right subject of course to reasonable restrictions. This
verdict brought relief to some street vendors who were
organised strongly but a large number of street vendors
suffered because of pronouncements of different High Courts.
Many times the issue of litigation in the Courts is diverted
to orders for eviction of street vendors.
The laws and their interpretation
thus assumes uttermost significance in the context of
ensuring livelihood of street vendors. Even the National
Policy of Urban Street Vendors adopted by the Government
of India on 20th January 2004 talks about amending Act.
But which are the Acts
to be amended? The National Policy mentions Police Act
and two sections of Indian Penal Code.
Police Act
Section
34 : Punishment for certain offences on road etc.
Any person who, on any road or in any open place or Street
or through fare within the limits of any town to which
this section shall be specially extended by the (State
government) commits any of the following offences to the
obstruction, inconvenience, annoyance, risk, danger of
damage of the (residence or passenger) shall on
conviction before a magistrate be liable to a fine not
exceeding fifty rupees or to imprisonment (with or without
hard labour) not exceeding eight days and it shall be
lawful for any Police Officer to take into custody, without
a warrant, any person who, within his view commits any
of such offences namely
(1) Exposing goods for sale i.e. any person who expose
any goods for sale.
Explanation: Any persons on any road, in any
open place expose any goods for sale which result into
obstruction, in convenience, annoyance, risks, danger,
or damaged to the residence or passenger will liable to
fined not exceeding 50 rupees or to imprisonment not exceeding
a days ( with or without hard labour).
Right of
the Police: It
would be lawful for any police officer to take into custody
without a warrant any person who within his view commit
any of such offence namely; exposing goods for sale.
Indian Penal Code
Section
283 – Danger or obstruction
in public way or line of navigation. “Whoever
by doing any act, or be omitting to take order with any
property in his profession or under his change, causes
danger, obstruction or injury to any person in any public
way or public line of navigation shall be punished with
fine which may extend to two hundred rupees.
Section
431 – Mischief
by injury to public road, bridge river or channel.
“Whoever commits mischief by doing any act which
render or which he knows to be likely to render or which
he knows to be likely to render any public road, bridge,
navigable channel, natural or artificial, impassable or
less safe for traveling or conveying property, shall be
punishable with imprisonment of either description for
a term which may extend to five years or with fine or
with both.
The National Policy also
suggests the phrase which can be proposed for amendedment-“Except
in case of street vendors/hawkers and service providers
with certain reasonable regulations” However, it
is necessary to examine what are the other acts and sections
within various acts which are used on misused by the police
and other authorities to harass the street vendors. If
34.4 of Police Act is frequently used in Bihar then
too section 108/109 of IPC is put to use in Ahmedabad.
Different places could be using it differently.
Exploring the laws, their
sections, the methodology used by police/authorities and
the adverse effect on their livelihood becomes very important.
However, street vendor organisations also have over the
years developed coping strategies. It would be a learning
process for very many street vendors and their organisations
if we can find and document then.
However, more than the
above there are also provisions which can be beneficial
to us. The Municipal Corporation Acts contain provisions
for licensing. To give example from Patna.
Patna Municipal Corporation Act
1951
Bylaws under section 281 (b) of PMC Act.
-
Sales of article on Corporation
Hand Street : No person shall be permitted to
use or occupy any part of any Public Street or place
for the sale of articles or the exercise of any calling
or the setting up of any booth or stall unless he
has previously obtained from the Chief Executive Officer
a license in form ‘A’.
- Such license may be granted for such specified period
not exceeding one year, as may be determined by the
Chief Executive Officer.
-
When the Chief Executive Officer
has determined to lease out any sites by auction,
he shall at least two weeks before the date on which
it is proposed to hold such action publish in the
manner provided in section 543 of the act a notice
of his intention to hold such auction. The notice
shall specify the place and the date and time at which
the auction shall be held.
-
A copy of every license granted
shall be sent forth with to the District Magistrate
and to the City Superintendent of the police.
-
Every license granted under the
preceding bye-laws shall be liable to the suspended
or cancelled by the Chief Executive Officer for reasons
to be recorded by him in writing. A copy of
cancellation should be forwarded to the DM and SP.
-
Any person using or occupying any
part of any public road or place for the sales of
articles or the exercise of any calling or selling
up any booth will be declared illegal.
FORM 'A'
LICENSE FOR THE SALE OF ARTICLES
ON MUNICIPAL LAND AND ROAD
-
Name of the
articles to be sold or calling to be exercised_________________________
-
Name and description
of the exact place to be used or occupied________________________
-
Hours of the
day or night during which the articles will sold or
the calling will be exercised________________________
-
The period during
which the license will be valid_________
-
The description
of booth or stall which will be set up and the hour
of the day or night during which it will be set up______________________
Date……….
Seal
of the Corporation
C.E.O
Which are these and how do we strengthen
these provisions. Further are there provisions in Indian
Penal Code or any other Acts which may be of help in protecting
and promoting the livelihood of street vendors.
A study is presently
being conducted by NASVI in Karnataka . Given below is
a short description of the study.
Comparative analysis
of law, local regulations and Hawkers in different levels
of urban bodies in Karnataka
Hawking is normally highlighted
as an issue in metro areas and not much is known in smaller
urban centers. There are several issues to be considered.
First, hawkers are impacted not only by the legal instrument,
but by the application of police manuals and procedures,
actions by municipal authorities, planning departments,
and finally, local level management. Each of these can
be both progressive or regressive to hawkers. Secondly,
hawkers as a group seek support from politicians, administrators,
NGOs, local leaders, and also via their alliances with
traders. Thirdly, hawkers are not
homogenous, but are of very different types. Thus, the
range of legal instruments, procedures and street level
management impact different groups differently. Finally,
different parts and localities of a city or town provide
different extents to which they are impacted by law or
regulations.
The study will look at
the relationship between law, state and local level regulations
on the situation of hawking in different levels of urban
bodies. We will look at the situation in Bangalore (Bangalore
City Corporation), Mysore (Mysore city Corporation), and
a small town Mallur (Town Municipal committee). We will
also look at these issues in terms of different types
of hawkers and small traders found in those urban centers.
Given below are the broad idea of issues we will look
at:
Characteristics of Hawking
-
Types of Hawkers / traders and
extent and type of problems faced and actors involved
in resolution
- Locations issues
- Permanent hawking locations, temporary hawking locations,
-
Access: Who gets easy access; who
supports them to get access to locations;
- History of hawking in that location
- Support structures: Party level, local politician,
local leaders
-
The real economics of hawking:
Bribes, finance, perceptions of consumers, applications
of fundamental rights (Right to livelihood, right
to work, National level policy, impact of new traffic
management)
Legal, Regulatory, Planning,
ground level management issues:
- Varied regulatory forms
- Impact of law,
- Police manual and traffic police
- Town planning and development Authority regulations,
(Urban planning: Land use, zoning, and development regulations)
- Municipal procedures and act
- Local street level management
B) Efficacy of
instruments: Hawking zones; license; de-notification of
market system;
The study is being conducted
by P Rajan who is a lawyer with 4 years professional experience,
and another 2 years on NGO experience. His legal experience
has been basically on issues of Human Rights, Child labour.
He has assisted in research projects on hawkers, local
economy, rental housing, urban governance. Mr Rajan is
familiar with the towns proposed and Bangalore City. Dr.
Solomon Benjamin is guiding the work in an honorary capacity.
Rajan is part of the Anisha Trust through which the research
is being conducted.
|